A healthcare professional reviewing a digital model predicting future patient outcomes, with data visualizations floating in the air, clinical settings in the background, and a futuristic interface. The scene shows collaboration between doctors and data scientists, emphasizing medical innovation and precision.
Clinical prediction models are essential tools in modern healthcare, aiding professionals in anticipating future health outcomes for patients. These models often rely on baseline predictors and aim to improve medical decision-making. Yet, the reliability of these models is frequently compromised by methodological shortcomings.
A comprehensive 13-step guide has been introduced to address these issues. The guide offers a detailed framework to improve the development and validation of clinical prediction models, ensuring they are more reliable, accurate, and applicable across different healthcare settings.
“Many models fail because of inadequate methodologies,” says Dr. Efthimiou. He emphasizes the need for a structured approach to avoid common pitfalls. This new guide emphasizes defining a clear objective at the outset, including identifying the target population, the outcome to be predicted, and the specific healthcare context in which the model will be applied.
“Prediction modeling isn’t just for statisticians,” adds Dr. Seo. “It requires collaboration between clinicians, methodologists, and even patients to ensure real-world relevance.” The guide underscores the need for interdisciplinary teams to ensure that all facets of the prediction model are adequately considered, from the initial conception to practical implementation.
A critical area where prediction models tend to fail is in how they handle data. The improper handling of continuous outcomes, the use of arbitrary cut-off points, and the tendency to overfit data are all common problems. “We need to avoid overfitting, which happens when models work well with a specific dataset but fail in other settings,” notes Dr. Debray.
One of the standout features of the guide is its focus on data quality. Missing data is a major issue in many prediction models. The guide offers robust strategies to address this, ensuring that the model can still perform well even when all the necessary data points aren’t available.
Big data and machine learning have opened new avenues for improving prognostic research. As Dr. Egger highlights, “These technologies have dramatically expanded our ability to create powerful prediction models, but they come with their own set of challenges, including the risk of bias.” The guide incorporates recommendations from the TRIPOD statement and the PROBAST tool to mitigate such risks.
Moreover, the 13-step framework encourages a constant reassessment of a model’s performance. It urges healthcare professionals to continually assess the model’s clinical utility and adapt it as necessary. “A model is only as good as its ability to make a positive impact in real-world medical decisions,” says Dr. Salanti.
By following these steps, researchers and healthcare professionals alike can develop robust, reliable models that make a real difference in patient care.
Citation: Efthimiou O, Seo M, Chalkou K, Debray T, Egger M, Salanti G. Developing and validating clinical prediction models: a 13-step guide. BMJ. 2023;386.
License: This content is generated from the original article original article and it’s under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
